This
is further confirmed by the fact that every British aristocratic family
had a Lord, a Bishop, a businessman in the City, and a landed
proprietor, confirming the active part played by Christianity in the
colonial system. The church was well and truly involved in the
subjugation and exploitation of the people in the colonies, and also had
financial interests in the colonial system. It is well known that the
first bank that dealt in multi-currency dealings was the Vatican, to
bankroll the money it acquired from the various countries. Colonialism
has now been overtaken by Neo-Colonialism, but the part played by the
church has not changed. Exploitation can only be continued if the
natural cohesion in societies is disrupted by groups aligned to foreign
forces. This is the aim of conversion.
David Frawley in his book Ethics of Conversion
says: “Missionary business remains one of the largest in the world and
it has enormous funding at many levels. It is like several multinational
corporations with different Catholic, Protestant and Evangelical groups
involved. There are full time staff and organisations allocating money,
creating Media hype, plotting strategies and seeking new ways to
promote conversions. The local native religion has about as much chance
as a local food-seller has if Mc Donald’s moves into his neighbourhood
with a slick well funded advertising campaign targeting his customers.
Yet while many third world countries have government policies to protect
small businesses, they usually has no safety mechanism to protect the
local religions.” These organisations have close relations with Western
governments and business establishments. The only change is that the
Whites have been replaced by Brown and Black evangelists who attract
less attention to the modus operandi.
Thus
the cycle of exploitation continues. It is ironic that the same people
who exploit the poor in third world use the same ill-gotten wealth to
convert. To a starving man the offer of crumbs of bread is enough reason
to convert. He does not understand that his benefactor is partially
responsible for his predicament. In the long term, the poor pay the
ultimate price of servility and exploitation for generations to come, so
well seen in Latin America and Africa. The only resistance to
conversion has been in Asia, which is now targeted.
Challenge of Buddhism
Buddhism
is adaptive. Being both a religion and a philosophical/ethical code, it
can cross political and cultural boundaries. It is a portable religion
geared to both reason and reflection. It is not divisive and offers a
way to the individual to liberate himself. Freedom of thought and the
proper understanding of the responsibility to oneself and ultimately to
others has great appeal to the educated. Given this freedom, Buddhism is
rapidly spreading in the west. Western paradigms like feminism,
democracy, pragmatic individualism, moral pluralism and social activism
can be accommodated in the religion which makes it more acceptable to
the westerner.
Buddhist
philosophy and practice is at the forefront of modern environmental
movements. The Buddhist ecological perspective is embodied in the
doctrine of Patticasamupadda (Dependent Co Origination), where
things exist not in their own right but interdependently. It addresses
humanity’s hubris regarding its traditional role as conqueror of nature,
a policy which contradicts the western Christian mindset that has
greatly contributed to the destruction of the environment. Thus Buddhism
not only is making inroads in Christianity’s core population in Europe
and America, but is challenging indirectly the western economic system
of consumption. It will be wrong to say this philosophy is purely
Buddhist; it encompasses all native Asian traditions like Hinduism,
Daoism, Jainism, etc. It is best embodied in the Asian Philosophy of
Harmony.
Shaku
Soen, the erudite Japanese priest credited with taking Buddhism to
America, who said in the late 19th century that the only hope for
Buddhism was in the west. He said there was a tiger in the form of
Christianity at the front door and a fox in the form of Islam at the
back door, which gave no hope for Buddhists in Asia. This is only
partially true. Buddhist societies have been resilient and have resisted
Christianisation for the last 200 years. That is why the process of
Christianisation is attempted with greater vigour now in the 21st
century.
Buddhism
is a hurdle to the continuous exploitation of natural resources in the
present economic system. Hence it is a long-term threat to Christianity,
as the latter is closely connected to the western economic system.
Continuous dialogue between the western Buddhist and native religious
societies are enlightening each other and fast bringing Buddhism into
the 21st century. This Buddhist threat to the fundamental Christian
objectives of domination and exploitation of natives has promoted a
vicious anti-Buddhist campaign conducted subtly by the church.
Destabilisation of Buddhist societies
Creating
violence and then moralising is one of the WMDs used by the Christian
church to destabilise native societies. The Karen rebels in Burma and
Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka were well supported by the Christian church.
They were in the forefront supporting the Tigers internationally. Their
propaganda machines depicted the war as a fight between Buddhists and
Hindus. It was not unusual to use a caricature of a Buddhist monk with
an AK-47 in one hand and a grenade in the other as a tool to denigrate
Buddhism in articles written in western media. This was done with a view
to reinforcing the western mindset that non-western religions are
dangerous cults, barbaric, primitive, intolerant and aggressive.
Having
created the mayhem, they highjack the moral authority. Hoards of NGOs
or human rights activists, social and medical workers etc., invade the
country. The purpose is to maximally utilise the predicament of the
victims for conversion. In Sri Lanka, Christianisation of Hindus and
Buddhists continues in the post-war situation. It is interesting that
none of these organisations ever condemned the Tigers who collected
money in UK and Europe to continue the violence; nor was there any
vociferous condemnation of the use of child soldiers.
Natural
disasters are also followed by the invasion of hoards of Christian
compassionates. After the Tsunami, some NGOs who arrived in Sri Lanka
have still not left the country. Active conversion is still going on.
The only country that resisted the Christian onslaught was Myanmar,
which has been roundly condemned. Myanmar had seen the predicament of
Sri Lanka.
Another
modus operandi is to gain the confidence of other religions by having a
‘dialogue’ with them. This is nothing more than a ruse to disarm the
reaction of the society against Christianisation.
Conversion
Organised
conversation between religions and common dialogue between religions is
acceptable. But organised conversion is like a trained army invading
another country. These missionary armies often go into communities where
there is little organised resistance or which may not even be aware of
their power or motives. They take advantage of communities that are
tolerant and open minded about religion, especially those that are
pluralistic like Buddhism and Hinduism, to promote their missionary
agenda.
Poor
destabilised Asian societies have become fertile grounds for
evangelists to “harvest souls”. In Sri Lanka, society’s tolerance has
exceeded its limits and violence has erupted on and off. This has become
another opportunity to the Christian media to propagate the myth of
Buddhist violence.
This was well-depicted in a Reuters article “Anti Christian Sentiment Rises in Buddhist Sri Lanka”
which never gave an inkling of the real situation or background to the
situation. Several Buddhist organisations have asked the government to
formulate an anti-conversion bill, but it is yet to materialise because
of pressure from the west. Evangelical conversion has progressed very
rapidly in South Korea which was a Buddhist country. Now about 40-60% of
the country is converted. The missionary activity that started with the
Korean War has succeeded.
Anti Buddhist Propaganda
Apart
from conversion, valiant attempts have been made to denigrate Buddhism.
Missionary bodies go about distributing books and pamphlets ridiculing
Buddhism and praising Christianity. Buddhist converts are made to
destroy Buddhist images and insult the religion before being accepted
into the faith.
The recent publication of “Buddhist Warfare”
by Michael Jerryson and Mark Juergensmeyer is another attempt at
discrediting the non-violent aspect of Buddhism. Depicted in a write up
by Katherine Wharton as “The Dark side of what is often thought to be
the most peaceful of all religions,” it debunks the faith. Incidentally,
Catherine Wharton has organised the India programme of the Archbishop
of Canterbury and the recent conference between Hindu and Christian
leaders in Bangalore.
The Response
Domination,
exploitation and destruction of native societies is the hidden agenda
of Christianization. Unless native governments and religious
organisations are aware of this, the poverty and cannibalisation of
Asian societies will continue. It is imperative that if Asian religions
and culture are to survive, there must be a response to this missionary
onslaught. Let us hope there will not be any more South Koreas.
The author is a Sri Lanka Buddhist